Monday, June 19, 2017

John Paul II would have had no problem with Amoris Laetitia he gave communion to the twice divorced, thrice married, and famous Zen-Buddhist playboy conductor, Herbert von Karajan.

By now the five dubia of cardinals Caffarra, Burke, Brandmuller, and Meisner submitted to Francis should been seen for the side-show that they are.  Dubias #2, #4, and #5, all reference John Paul II’s Encyclical "Veritatis Splendor".  Why are they bringing up an encyclical which no one pays attention to, much less the author of it?   What speaks louder, the meaningless words of John Paul II or his actions?  Yes, John Paul II wrote this encyclical several years after the above video but we would bet that John Paul II continued to give communion to divorcees after it was written.  John Paul II never did public penance in reparation for this.  Why are the four cardinals pretending that John Paul II was anything other than a modernist?  This is duplicitous behavior on the part of the four cardinals.  How come none of the conservative religious media have pointed any of this out?

Amoris Laetitia is just another
hermeneutic of continuity!


  1. JP2 was a heretical antipope who spoke blasphemy.

  2. I saw him conduct twice in Germany back in the 80's. Looks like JP2 was as forktongued as the current material occupant of the chair of Peter.